Science and the Creator
“DNA - the template of life”
David Burges
Wellesbourne
|
 |
|
|
It seems that the greatest quest of modern man is to
understand the nature and origin of life. In this enterprise the
supreme place of God as Creator is totally ignored in favour of
seeking a wholly naturalistic explanation of life and its
beginnings.
Two landmark steps have characterised man’s search. The first
was the discovery in 1953 of the double helical structure of DNA
(deoxyribonucleic acid) by Watson and Crick, based upon the
largely unrecognised study of DNA crystals by Rosalind Franklin.
The second, almost exactly fifty years later, was the completion
by several teams of the description of the human genome, the
entire sequence of base units that make up human DNA.
Scientists have trumpeted great possibilities as the result of
these discoveries: that many cancers and genetic diseases will
become curable, and that the secrets of life itself will be
uncovered. So far, no fewer than nine Nobel prizes have been
awarded for DNA research. But in truth, while some practical
benefits will undoubtedly accrue, each new discovery seems only
to open the door to ever greater complexity and consequent
incontrovertible evidence of intelligent, purposeful design by
the great Creator. The structure of DNA
To mark the fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of the
double helix, a series of articles was commissioned by New
Scientist describing the present understanding of the structure
and activity of DNA.1 It
seems that the double helix configuration is now recognised to
be only a part of the story. Within the nuclei of cells, DNA is
wound and folded in an amazingly intricate manner, and mixed
with more than twice as much other protein material. This was
once thought to be merely rather dull scaffolding, albeit with
the daunting task of folding the two metres or so length of DNA
inside the tiny five-micrometer-diameter2
cell nucleus. However, that view is changing rapidly.
The building blocks of the scaffold, called nucleosomes, are
formed from eight special proteins called histones, which are
rolled into tightly packed balls with loose ends sticking out
(see Figure 1 below). Successive sections of the DNA double
helix are wound around each ball, not quite two turns, and then
trail off to the next one, forming a chain like a string of
hairy beads. This chain is then tightly coiled up to form
chromatin fibre which, in turn, is folded up into the
chromosomes. Each human cell contains a complement of forty-six
chromosomes.
It used to be thought that the chromosomes were simply jumbled
in the cell nucleus like pieces of string in a bag, but recent
work has shown that they have highly complex and ordered
locations within the cell nucleus. There seems to be a general
rule that ‘busy’ genes, that is, ones that are frequently
switched on to synthesise proteins, are sited at the outer
edges, which may be because there they have better access to the
special chemicals known as enzymes that activate their
operation. But this research is at an early stage, and very
little is known about how changes in location can apparently
awaken dormant genes and inactivate others. The whole structure
of DNA and its packaging within the cell nucleus displays the
greatest possible ingenuity, and that alone declares the
intelligence which designed it. |
|

|
Fig. 1. The amazing way DNA is
packaged into the nuclei of cells:
1. Balls of histone proteins form the core of nucleosomes—DNA is
wrapped around the nucleosomes
2. The nucleosomes are packed into chromatin fibre
3. Chromatin fibre is packed into chromosomes, within the
nucleus of each cell. |
DNA Repair
Soon after the discovery of the chemical structure of DNA it
was predicted that it would be a conductor of electricity, and
this has been confirmed using purified DNA in the test tube. At
first this seemed to be of only academic interest, but it is now
suspected by many workers in the field that this ability of DNA
has a vital role in the detection and repair of damage. DNA is a
surprisingly unstable molecule and is under constant attack in
the cell, primarily from the effects of oxidation by highly
active chemical groups called free radicals. It has recently
been shown that affected sites can migrate electrically along
the DNA chain, and it seems possible that in this way the damage
is conducted away from vital genes to special inactive areas to
await the attention of repair enzymes. Much of this damage comes
from environmental sources such as ultraviolet light and toxic
chemicals, especially those in cigarette smoke, and can lead to
many diseases, including cancers and genetic disorders. There is
also growing evidence that accumulated damage to DNA is
primarily responsible for the universal phenomenon of ageing. As
a result, cells expend a great deal of energy in searching for
and rectifying damage. The cell has four main mechanisms for
repairing DNA, both before and after cell division, and as many
as 130 genes are thought to be involved. Repair enzymes
constantly patrol the DNA chains looking for distortions of the
double helix and repairing them.
There is a deep irony here. All organisms share the same repair
mechanisms, and so these are considered by evolutionists to have
evolved very early in the history of life. But another name for
DNA damage is mutation, the accidental chance process by which
new advantageous characteristics are supposed to appear in
organisms and be preserved by natural selection. Evolution is
thus dependent upon DNA damage. So the repair mechanisms must
have evolved to prevent evolution!
But scientists cling to their faith. One researcher recognises
that if the repair system were absolutely perfect evolution
would be stopped in its tracks: “Without mutation, there can be
no evolution”. So although DNA damage is so dangerous to the
cell and consequently to life, and although elaborate mechanisms
work constantly to repair it, evolutionists have to believe that
enough ‘good’ mutations survive the repair process to allow
evolution to proceed.
Mind-boggling complexity
Scientists are adept at conveying the impression that their
theories are virtually complete and that all the facts are now
explained. So with the sequencing of the human genome the
impression can be given that the secrets of life have now been
unravelled. All that it has done, however, is to reveal even
deeper layers of complexity.
Every one of the cells in our body contains the same genetic
blueprint in the form of its DNA, yet cells are specialised, or
differentiated, into hundreds of different types: bone, muscle,
liver, retina, and so on. Thus each type of cell must be reading
the DNA code in a different way, and that implies the existence
of another set of instructions even more complex than DNA’s
string of genetic ‘letters’. Researchers now believe that this
code is encrypted in the histone balls (or nucleosomes)
described above, around which the DNA is packaged in the cell
nucleus.
The ‘loose ends’ that stick out from the histone balls
around which the DNA is wound (Figure 1 above) have been found
to contain various chemical groups which affect whether nearby
genes are active or inactive. Recently, researchers have
proposed that these chemical groups on the histone tails are
working as a code to control the activity of single genes or of
whole groups of genes together. The overall effect is described
as mind-bogglingly complicated; the number of combinations on a
single nucleosome may run into thousands, and the code can
constantly change as enzymes add or remove tail groups. Already
medical researchers are exploring ways of modifying these groups
to treat specific diseases.
The Creator's Genius
To imagine that all of these deeper and deeper levels of
complexity are the result of purely chance processes is absurd
in the extreme. The very fact that cells have complex mechanisms
with sets of instructions that can be referred to as ‘codes’
implies that they have an intelligent origin. These codes are in
fact the equivalent of computer software, the sets of
instructions that allow computers to carry out complex tasks. As
everyone knows, producing such software is a highly skilled,
costly and lengthy process, and no one would imagine that it
could possibly write itself! Yet this is precisely what the
naturalistic explanation of the origin of life demands — that
all of these immensely complex codes controlling the
multitudinous operations of the living cell have written
themselves, by accident!
How much more satisfying to recognise the remarkable discoveries
of the past fifty years as revealing the beauty and wonder of
the work of an Almighty Hand, and, as even greater marvels come
to light through the continuing investigations of science, to
ascribe to their Designer the praise which is His due: “Let all
the earth fear the LORD: let all the inhabitants of the world
stand in awe of Him. For He spake, and it was done; He
commanded, and it stood fast” (Ps. 33:8,9). |
Footnotes
1 “DNA—50 years of the double helix”,
New Scientist, 15 Mar. 2003.
2 A micrometer is one millionth of a
meter. With thanks to The
Testimony magazine,
http://www.testimony-magazine.org (first
published October 2004). |
|
Questions, comments,
problems? Email
us
Leamington Christadelphians, 2006
|
|